Skip to main content

ASPOREA® Change Management • Canberra

All resources

Free diagnostic tool

ASPOREA® Change Investment Justification Tool.

Estimate value at risk from under-adoption, delayed benefits and under-investment in change.

Start the assessment

How to use it

Complete the questions and review your results.

Enter your program figures, then rate each risk statement from 1 to 5.

Assessment

Asporea Change Investment Justification Tool

How to use: This tool estimates indicative exposure if the uplift is not funded, and compares it to the cost to uplift change capability. Complete as a change team assessment based on evidence and current delivery conditions.

Money fields accept shorthand: 5m, 2.5m, 300k, or full numbers (commas and $ are fine).

Completion
0%
0 / 13 questions answered
Status
Enter all numbers and answer all questions for results and print.
Used for uplift cost pro rating and benefit delay exposure.
What is actually assigned today.
Additional FTE recommended (gap).
Use a fully loaded rate if you have it (salary, on costs, contractor margins).
Checklist: ✓ means the input is complete and valid.
Scale (1 is lower, 5 is higher)
1 Low or well controlled 2 Some risk 3 Mixed or inconsistent 4 High risk 5 Very high risk
Adoption risk drivers
Delivery complexity is high (dependencies, ambiguity, or frequent scope changes).
Lower Higher
Sponsor strength is weak or inconsistent (visibility, decisions, reinforcement).
Lower Higher
Organisational maturity is low (process inconsistency, unclear ownership, BAU instability).
Lower Higher
Change capability history is weak (previous changes struggled to sustain adoption).
Lower Higher
Change load and saturation are high (competing initiatives, fatigue, capacity constraints).
Lower Higher
Psychosocial hazard risk (WHS lens)
Job demands during the change (pace, workload, cognitive load) are likely to be excessive for impacted roles.
Lower Higher
Role clarity and change related expectations are unclear for many impacted workers.
Lower Higher
Worker control is low (little influence over timing, workload, sequencing, or how work will be done).
Lower Higher
Support is insufficient (manager capability, resourcing, practical help at go live).
Lower Higher
The change increases job insecurity or uncertainty (including restructure anxiety).
Lower Higher
There is high change saturation or fatigue (multiple concurrent changes).
Lower Higher
Consultation and participation mechanisms are weak or inconsistent.
Lower Higher
Known hotspots exist (prior incidents, high turnover, behavioural risks, or high stress areas).
Lower Higher

Results

Enter all numbers and answer all questions for results and print.

This tool provides a rapid indicative snapshot based on information entered at a point in time. Use the results alongside impact assessment, stakeholder insights and delivery risk information. It is not intended to assess individual performance.

Larger groups

Use this tool across a program or organisation.

Contact ASPOREA about facilitated assessments or consolidated results for a larger group.

Discuss your requirements