ASPOREA® Make AI and Digital Transformation Actually Stick

PCT HEALTH CHECK DIAGNOSTIC TOOL

The PCT Project Health Check is a quick questionnaire that scores how healthy a change initiative is across Project, Change, and Talent factors. It highlights the weakest area so you can prioritise where to focus next (for example, governance and planning, adoption and communications, or sponsorship and leadership alignment).

INSTRUCTIONS

Read each statement and select a response from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). You can work through the questions sequentially, or choose your own order.

HOW SCORING WORKS

Your responses are mapped to a readiness score out of 100. Guidance is shown only after every question has been answered.

Once all questions are complete, a Print results (A4) button will appear.

This generates a printer friendly summary that you can save as a PDF or print for workshops and planning.

The Role group and Expected impact dropdowns are optional. They help you contextualise the results on the printout, but they do not change the score.

DISCLAIMER

This is a rapid indicative snapshot based on perceptions at a point in time. Use it alongside impact assessment, stakeholder insights, and delivery risk inputs. It is not intended for assessing individual performance.

PCT Project Health Check

Overall PCT health
0/ 100
0 / 20 answered
Status
Answer all questions for guidance.
Scale (1 is weaker, 5 is stronger)
1 Strongly disagree 2 Disagree 3 Neither agree nor disagree 4 Agree 5 Strongly agree

Success

Corner score: 0/100
The outcomes and benefits we are aiming for are clear and agreed.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Success measures are defined and can be tracked with available data.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
The scope and priorities are clear enough to guide trade offs and decisions.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
The expected impacts on customers and operations are understood and planned for.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
There is a realistic view of what success looks like at each stage, not just at the end.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Talent

Corner score: 0/100
A primary sponsor is clearly identified and accountable for adoption.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
The sponsor coalition is aligned on the purpose, urgency, and priorities of the change.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Sponsors are visible and active in supporting the change, not just endorsing it.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Leaders address barriers and resistance quickly and consistently.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
People leaders understand their role and are being enabled to support their teams.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Project

Corner score: 0/100
The project has clear governance, roles, and decision rights.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Plans, milestones, and dependencies are defined and actively managed.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Risks and issues are identified early and handled with a clear escalation path.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Resourcing and capacity are adequate for delivery and business as usual.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
The project manages changes to scope and priorities in a controlled way.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Change

Corner score: 0/100
There is a structured change management approach for this initiative.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Key impacted groups have been identified and impacts are understood.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Communications are planned, owned, and delivered through the right senders.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Training and performance support are planned and timed to enable adoption.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Reinforcement is planned, including measures, feedback loops, recognition, and consequences.
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Guidance

Answer all questions for guidance.

Let’s Make Your Transformation Work in Practice

If you are planning or delivering an AI, digital or major reform initiative, early adoption planning significantly improves outcomes and reduces delivery risk.